SharePoint does not have a build version. Full Stop.
CU 14 December 14 February 15 Share this: Tweet. Like this: Like Loading Published October 14, May 7, Previous Post SharePoint news! Thanks Cliff Like Like. Hi Cliff Fernandes, if English is your default language the farm was installed with, then you may not anticipate problems. Thanks for your help, Zolt Like Like. Hi Zolt, with language packs there is always something special to be considered.
Examples of common formulas in SharePoint Lists - SharePoint
HtH, cheers, Steve Like Like. Very good post Best regards! Thanks for such useful and time saving article. Hello Syed, thanks for the mistake, I have corrected the Link and it should now point to the correct KB. Hi Steve, Thanks for such useful and time saving article. Thanks a lot in advance. If we have version Thanks Like Like. Older Comments. Leave a Reply Cancel reply Enter your comment here Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:. Email required Address never made public. Name required. Post was not sent - check your email addresses! Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
Title and post in reference. Project Server KB articles.
Global language. Notes, Remarks, Known Issues. Major release.
- An important fix for SharePoint Foundation SP1 has just been released – Stefan Goßner;
- Carrinho de compras.
- REDEEMED; FROM EARTHS GRAVEL TO GODS GLORY.
SP1 — SP1 and June CU. SP2 — June CU SharePoint on mobile devices is a rising topic that might be included in a new section. It might be better if someone else did the writing since I'm in the space, but I can write it neutral if no one else wants to volunteer.
I took the liberty of writing the Mobile section as best as I could, should I edit the page? I have no idea who this non-existence distinction between SharePoint Server products and some kind of called SharePoint took hold among some people on the site, but the concept is never used by Microsoft in talking about the product. In the Client Software section of the article, the link to SharePoint browser support planning guidelines returns a file not found error on the Microsoft site. Could someone that knows more about the product check this is the right page to reference?
This article was written by me, a developer, a designer, and a technical consultant. As such it's not the best article for an end-user perspective on SharePoint. Would appreciate someone with expertise adding that section. The first sentence of the article is practically free of information.
Request that somebody who understands this product write a concise summary which doesn't rely on knowing what the product does.
Leopd talk , 20 April UTC. Of particular note should be citations. This article contains very few citations, although in my view the structure of the content is more comprehensive. We need to use as many citations as possible from all documents merged into this document. Is that a different version than Foundation, Standard and Enterprise? Another noun-as-verb!
Senior Product Manager, Microsoft
What does "surface" mean in this context? Is there a better way to say this? How about a section discussing how add-ons can be installed to extend the out-of-the-box functionality? It could be added as a sub-section of the Configuration and Customization section. Also references to lists of add-ons would be useful. Kjhosein talk , 8 August UTC. The opening two paragraphs feel like they use unnecessarily positive language when describing Sharepoint: "recent versions have significantly broader capabilities," and "SharePoint comprises a multipurpose set of web technologies which are useful for many organizations,".
Would these be better with a more objective cast? Or, perhaps just delete those two sentences altogether: "By default, SharePoint has a Microsoft Office-like interface, and it is closely integrated with the Office suite. The web tools are designed to be usable by non-technical users. Does anyone know what this product actually is? This reads like a Microsoft marketing Web site and there is no description of what this software is used for.
In Pages subsection of Core platform functionality section, the second sentence begins "Unlike prior versions of SharePoint, the default page type is That should be specified, including the version, though I'm not willing to add it given the ambiguity and my limited understanding of SharePoint. Sharepoint is one of the most criticized products , yet there's nothing in here at all!
Subscribe to RSS
You are commenting using your WordPress. You are commenting using your Google account. You are commenting using your Twitter account. You are commenting using your Facebook account. Notify me of new comments via email. Notify me of new posts via email. This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed. Connect Search. Resources SPSite. Like this: Like Loading